A reference made in a recent Minnesota family law-related media piece citing a “hot-button, emotionally charged issue” could be focused upon any number of topics, right?
After all, the family law sphere — especially as relates to divorce — frequently concerns such matters, given its inherent focal point.
Which are people.
And where people are involved in affairs centered on family matters, things can get complex and passion-laden in a hurry. Family law considerations encompass broad subject-matter terrain, ranging from child custody, property distribution, and marital contracts (e.g., prenuptial and postnuptial agreements) to paternity, family business valuation, and myriad other concerns.
Like alimony, for instance.
The above-cited article’s “hot button” reference is to that topic, which is also called spousal maintenance or spousal support in Minnesota.
In a nutshell, the article’s gist is this: Some persons tasked to pay spousal maintenance think they got a raw deal, especially when they cannot see an endpoint on the horizon marking the termination of that obligation.
There is absolutely no doubt that considerable complexity can attach to alimony. We allude to that on a relevant page of our website at the Minneapolis-based Mack & Santana Law Offices, P.C., noting therein that a number of factors can be germane to alimony in a given case and influence a court’s decision regarding post-divorce spousal support.
In the aforementioned article, the primary concern is with so-called “permanent alimony” and issues surrounding its fairness, with the piece noting a current effort by one state legislator to amend Minnesota law through revised statutory language that would change Minnesota’s laws on cohabitation and its impact on alimony or spousal maintenance.
Any Minnesota resident with questions or concerns regarding the payment or receipt of spousal maintenance might reasonably want to contact a proven attorney with a deep well of experience representing clients in this important family law sphere.
.jpg)
.jpg)
